![]() For the mesial surface, the mandibular second premolar presented the highest mean value (1.376 mm ± 0.198 p<0.001). RESULTS: No significant differences were found between right and left teeth. Teeth were compared according to the mesial and distal thicknesses by ANOVA and Tukey's test. Comparisons between thicknesses by arch side and proximal surface were carried out using Student's t-tests (α = 0.05). METHODS: The measurements were previously obtained on cut sections of mandibular central (n = 30) and lateral (n = 30) incisors, canines (n = 20), first (n = 40) and second (n = 40) premolars maxillary central (n = 20) and lateral (n = 20) incisors, canines (n = 20), first (n = 40) and second (n = 42) premolars. Thus, proximal enamel measurements of human permanent teeth were compared in this study. IIIDDS, MSc in Orthodontics, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of São Paulo City (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, BrazilĪIM: Knowledge of enamel thickness is relevant to perform stripping during orthodontic treatment. IDDS, MSc, PhD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of São Paulo City (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil IIDDS, MSc, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, University of São Paulo City (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil ![]() Mapping of proximal enamel thickness in permanent teethįlávio Vellini-Ferreira I Flávio Augusto Cotrim-Ferreira II José Alaor Ribeiro III Cívea Inês Ferreira-Santos II
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |